The article claims the group doesn’t yet have a catchy acronym – but can you spot one…there’s a sting in every tail!
Mark Gardner makes a typically good point (Faversham News, Gardner Digs, October 1, 2015) in suggesting that Faversham drivers should grin and bear it at the “modestly” congested junction of Ashford Road/A2/The Mall, rather than submit to the expensive and uncertain outcome of traffic lights or roundabouts.
In fact drivers could go one step further and slow down to a maximum of 20mph as they approach the junction. In doing so they might find, contrary to perceived wisdom, they actually get through the junction faster. Why? Because junctions become more efficient at lower speeds.
If you don’t believe me, you can try it yourself. Next time you drive through, take five or ten miles off your speed. What you might find is that cars waiting to turn into the road ahead of you are able to do so more easily. Rather than having to wait for you – and perhaps the chain of speeding cars behind you – to get through, they can instead slip in to the road ahead of you. Now imagine what would happen if most people did this. The entire junction would flow more efficiently.
Before we spend tens of thousands of pounds on lights or roundabouts, we could carry out a no-cost experiment by driving at 20, not 30mph through the junction. If this works then, for a modest cost – well below the capital expense of the municipal transport paraphernalia currently under consideration – we could install 20mph signs and begin the transformation of Faversham’s driving culture. At 20mph drivers can nod, wave and smile at each other. Now fancy that.
We might use all five fingers to greet each other and not just one or two.
We’re told we should do our best. And that’s right. But I believe we need to do more than that. We should do the best. This means we need help to do more than we can do alone. We need to surround ourselves with people who can form a team to do the best.
Does Faversham want a plan that’s fit for purpose? Of course it should have one. But how about a plan that is at the top of the game? That sets highest standards? That wins awards?
I believe Faversham deserves the best. Not just our best – the best.
Boy do some elected members in @SwaleCouncil & #Faversham Town Council not like cyclists! All sorts of insult & scaremongery was manifest at yesterday evening’s Local Engagement Forum.
Here’s a selection of their views: Cyclists kill. Cyclists are anti social. Not just the young ones but the old ones too.
I intervened to point out:
– towns and cities throughout the UK are positively encouraging greater levels of cycling because they see cycling as part of their sustainability strategy, part of their economic regeneration strategy, part of their health strategy
– the UK’s population is changing with greater levels of younger people and young families who want to cycle if they are given the option
– if Faversham is seeking to ban cyclists then it is going backwards
– cars kill, injure and intimidate much more than cyclists yet we don’t talk about them in these pejorative ways
– rather than victimise people who choose to cycle we should be encouraging a culture of civilised behaviour throughout the town
– the 20s Plenty campaign is key to this
– and, by the way, on the point that Faversham isn’t the Netherlands, Bristol has the UK’s highest levels of cycling. Bristol has hills. Faversham has slopes.
The senior police officer there, speaking in a personal capacity said that if it was up to him he would deregulate rather than regulate. Remove signs not add more of them. He quoted the case of Ashford where the urban design approach there has led to lower levels of injuries and fatalities. He thanked me for intervening.
It makes me wonder – if we left it to experts like this officer, how much better, more civilised, convivial and economically successful could Faversham be?
Look at this beautiful image of Horsham in West Sussex…
The street is paved in high quality materials. There are no yellow lines. There’s planting. It looks like a place you’d like to be in.
What more could any place want?
Look at the trees in planters – they’re moveable. They can be placed anywhere according to the needs of the day. They can be moved by the emergency services if they’re ever in the way.
This is the benefit of careful design: thinking the problem through and finding a solution that works under many different scenarios. The elegant hand of beauty.
And isn’t this exactly what Faversham needs too?
What is especially remarkable and relevant for Faversham is that East Street in Horsham didn’t always look this pretty:
Look at the double yellow lines, the tarmac, the dull municipal road signage. The single tree. The heavy hand of plodding transport planning.
If Horsham can get rid of its yellow lines then why can’t Faversham?
The answer is: we can. We just need to choose to do so.
We need to accept that there are other, and better, ways to control parking that respect the historic fabric of the town, that celebrate life and that seek the best solution for the place – not the dull, municipal average.
2nd September 2015
Good evening. It is an honour to have been asked to speak this evening and I’m grateful to Lady Sondes, Sir David Melville and Chris Wright for their invitation. As I prepared for this evening I wondered if I had ever given a talk on the water. I thought I hadn’t and then I remembered I once spoke at a conference on board a cruise ship between Genoa and Marseille. I’m pleased to say I’d trade the crystal waters of the Côte D’Azur for the muds of the Côte de North Kent any day.
We are lucky to be here and lucky to be part of Faversham. Simon Foster mentioned the work I’m involved in that’s looking at the UK 50 years from now. This may seem like a long time but it’s a drop in the ocean/Creek for Faversham. Here we have at least 9,000 years of continuous human habitation. There aren’t many other places in the UK that can claim this. In fact we don’t yet know of any that can.
And why did people first come here and then stick around for so long? It’s the Creek. First for the hunting: its game, its fish and its fowl. Then for its waterborne trade. We are one tide from London, where merchants could poise offshore, like greyhounds in the trap, waiting for fire signals from London to tell them their stock prices were high enough to catch the next tide in.
This place is important. This water is important. Many of us feel this viscerally. Others still need persuading. How can we do that?
I have seven thoughts. Continue reading The future of Faversham Creek
Draft in progress…
First of all, ask the question:
“What is the problem that needs solving?”
What are Faversham’s needs? Schools? Healthcare? Affordable housing? Establish a list of requirements. Be prepared to negotiate. The spirit of civic engagement.
Follow a set of design principles that history suggests deliver positive outcomes…
If not here then where else?
If here then what else is on or near the site that can benefit from the new development eg the sports hall of a local school or a nearby shop or business that can see better trade to help support the local economy?
What is missing in the local neighbourhood that could be provided by the new development eg educational, healthcare or employment uses?
Principle: explot adjacencies and inter-dependencies…
How can new road connections and road junctions benefit the existing situation eg by providing additional cross-town routes to add capacity to the existing infrastructure.
Analysis: most streets in towns are through streets, not cul de sacs. As a result, most streets have a combination of a) movement heading to or from them as well as b) movement passing through. For most streets in towns, this blend is normal. Problems occur when some residential streets have to carry too large a burden of through movement while others carry too little. The through streets can feel hostile, especially when the design of the street allows vehicles to speed eg South Road. In contrast, through streets increase the overall accessibility of developments, which can benefit house prices and reduce property crime.
Principle: most new streets should be designed as through streets. Through movement should be controlled at low speeds so that it does not speed through areas.
How can new development be designed to reduce the need to drive eg good walking and cycling paths, including pedestrian crossings at the edges of the development so that people can walk and cycle into the town centre and into other residential areas of the town?
Principle: the connected grid…
How can the streets and open spaces of the development be designed to support biodiversity eg to create an attractive and convivial environment where people choose to walk and cycle rather than to drive?
Principle: 20mph streets…
How can uses be mixed so that we don’t just get houses?
Principle: mixed use development…